| Posted: May 15 2009 at 10:27pm | IP Logged
|
|
|
It is not about "diversity" really. It is about getting and keeping title 1 funds. It is NOT about helping the low performing students. Nodes are scrutinized and students are bused out of low performing schools to the extent that the school can receive title 1 funds- but not lose the funds because it is performing too low.
The students that are bused out lose the ability to benefit from the title 1 support that the school close to their home receives. They are just plunked down into a school where many of the students greatly outperform them. They sit on a bus for long periods of time that could be spent more productively just to be shipped to a school where they perform just as badly (as shown by the scores).
Additionally, they aren't able to participate in extracurricular after school activities/ sports since they live so far away and need to be on the bus. The children that live near the school go home and hang out together or participate in extracurricular activites near their homw or at school together. Then they say they are doing it for "diversity" ( a word with more magic than the words- we want more money but can't help your children) so that the parents will agree to all this craziness and maybe they won't notice that their children are doing just as poorly in the new location. Hey- their "school" is not failing after all.
There is a significant amount of federal money at stake here and the purpose is to use the money so that the students who need the help can get it (I'd think without all the time consuming travel that prevents school participation). It's not intended to be a shell game.
|